SAJ: G
Dunman High: S
RI: GwH
YJC: S
NYJC: G
HCI: GwH
MJC: G
SRJC: B
TJC: S
PJC: B
NJC: G
TPJC: S
RVHS: G
AJC: GwH
CJC: GwH
ACJC: GwH
NUSH: B
VJC: GwH
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
SYF Pt 3
PJ: Pre: HB Actual: B
Had split notes and generally airy tone; rushing for certain bits of cantate
NJ: Pre: HG/ GwH Actual: G
Although they had pitch problems and a tendency to go flat (esp for the set piece), there were some magical moments for the second piece. The last piece also showcased their technical abilities - control and subtlety in phrasing.
TPJ: Pre: HS Actual: S
Pitch problems for set piece; was best IMHO for the third piece - basses and tenors had many nice moments - esp with the intervals, however the piece was repetitive and was not technically challenging. [edited]
RVHS: Pre: S Actual: G
Had many pitch problems (split notes) and had a tendency to go sharp
AJ: Pre: HG/ GwH Actual: GwH
General tendency to go sharp though the overall performance was alright
CJ: Pre: HS Actual: GwH
Pitching issues - had voices (esp tenors) sticking out for set piece; second piece was generally well done; some phrasing felt disjointed in the third piece
ACJ: Pre: GwH Actual: GwH
Had best interpretation (imho) for set piece; split notes in sops for first two pieces; felt their forte for the first two pieces could have been more (considering their size); tenors could have had a more grounded tone than what was heard
NUS: Pre: CoP/ LB Actual: B
Had many pitch issues for first piece; recovered a little for 2nd and 3rd piece; moments where it was pretty good
VJ: Pre: GwH Actual: GwH
Were generally good pitch-wise; liked the tone of the basses, but didn't feel that intensity that makes u feel like u're listening to magic
Had split notes and generally airy tone; rushing for certain bits of cantate
NJ: Pre: HG/ GwH Actual: G
Although they had pitch problems and a tendency to go flat (esp for the set piece), there were some magical moments for the second piece. The last piece also showcased their technical abilities - control and subtlety in phrasing.
TPJ: Pre: HS Actual: S
Pitch problems for set piece; was best IMHO for the third piece - basses and tenors had many nice moments - esp with the intervals, however the piece was repetitive and was not technically challenging. [edited]
RVHS: Pre: S Actual: G
Had many pitch problems (split notes) and had a tendency to go sharp
AJ: Pre: HG/ GwH Actual: GwH
General tendency to go sharp though the overall performance was alright
CJ: Pre: HS Actual: GwH
Pitching issues - had voices (esp tenors) sticking out for set piece; second piece was generally well done; some phrasing felt disjointed in the third piece
ACJ: Pre: GwH Actual: GwH
Had best interpretation (imho) for set piece; split notes in sops for first two pieces; felt their forte for the first two pieces could have been more (considering their size); tenors could have had a more grounded tone than what was heard
NUS: Pre: CoP/ LB Actual: B
Had many pitch issues for first piece; recovered a little for 2nd and 3rd piece; moments where it was pretty good
VJ: Pre: GwH Actual: GwH
Were generally good pitch-wise; liked the tone of the basses, but didn't feel that intensity that makes u feel like u're listening to magic
SYF Pt 2
NYJC: Pre: HG Actual: G
Some obvious errors in pitching, but overall a strong showing
HCI: Pre: GwH Actual: GwH
Interesting pieces; crucifixus was imho a little too heavy/ tenative - but that's a personal pref; had stable and good overall performance
MJ: Pre: HG Actual: G
Good overall performance, but it lacked a certain intensity despite there being increase and decrease in dynamics
SRJ: Pre: B Actual: B
Earnest performance, but had many pitch errors (split notes etc) and pieces were not of a high technical difficulty
TJ: Pre: LS Actual: S
Tenors generally needed to have a rounder, thicker voice; had some pitch errors throughout
Some obvious errors in pitching, but overall a strong showing
HCI: Pre: GwH Actual: GwH
Interesting pieces; crucifixus was imho a little too heavy/ tenative - but that's a personal pref; had stable and good overall performance
MJ: Pre: HG Actual: G
Good overall performance, but it lacked a certain intensity despite there being increase and decrease in dynamics
SRJ: Pre: B Actual: B
Earnest performance, but had many pitch errors (split notes etc) and pieces were not of a high technical difficulty
TJ: Pre: LS Actual: S
Tenors generally needed to have a rounder, thicker voice; had some pitch errors throughout
SYF Pt 1
SAJC: Pre: LG (edited) Actual: G
Tendency to go flat, male voices tend to be nasal, entrances could be less sudden
Dunman High: Pre: LS Actual: S
Chamber choir with tendency to go flat; has a muffle sound; lack of balance between male and female voices
RI: Pre: HG Actual: GwH
Cheated with diction in Crucifixus and phrasing a bit heavy; went a little out of tune for set piece
YJ: Pre: LS Actual: S
Problems mainly with diction; generally airy tune; stayed more in tune than dunman
Tendency to go flat, male voices tend to be nasal, entrances could be less sudden
Dunman High: Pre: LS Actual: S
Chamber choir with tendency to go flat; has a muffle sound; lack of balance between male and female voices
RI: Pre: HG Actual: GwH
Cheated with diction in Crucifixus and phrasing a bit heavy; went a little out of tune for set piece
YJ: Pre: LS Actual: S
Problems mainly with diction; generally airy tune; stayed more in tune than dunman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
Visitors
